# khuram

• ## Total Visits Here!

• 132,263 hits

## Issue of larger brain size of Einstien:

Posted by Magellanic Cloud on July 20, 2009 People believe in scientific myths that Einstien got some extraordinary brain:)

Was really E=mc2 anything new???

Not at all…!!!

So, in a sense, there was nothing new in “energy-mass equivalence”.

“c” is only the so-called absolute form of “v”.

When talking in absolute terms (i.e. not in half terms where K.E is half of Total Energy), then we don’t need “1/2” in the equation of K.E.

We simply get “E=mc2”

It is said that this wonderful formula describes energy equivalent of mass at rest. Since value of c is so high so an ordinary mass at rest will be possessing huge quantity of energy. It is also said that this formula rightly predicted such things as Nuclear Bomb.

Whereas fact is that this formula only describes such an hypothetical situation where velocity “v” of a mass has reached to the standard maximum value i.e. “c”. So actually this formula has nothing to do with state of rest of mass.

It is so assumed that this formula describes energy equivalent of mass at rest because “c” has been considered a “universal constant”. Again, fact is that within the context of matter having mass, “c” is not any “universal constant”. “c” is just the standard maximum value of a “variable” which is velocity “v”. Despite official claims of Science, there are so many unofficial counter claims that speed of light “c” is not constant or even the maximum possible speed. But here we don’t need to go against official claims. Let us accept that speed of light may be constant and may it be the maximum possible value of “v”. But point is that even then “c” cannot be regarded as “universal constant” when talking in terms of matter and mass. Because after all then it is only a value of a variable “v”. So in this sense, if “c” is not a universal constant, it means that formula E=mc2 is not describing state of rest of mass. It is only describing an hypothetical situation where value of speed (i.e. a variable “v”) of certain mass has reached to the standard maximum value which is “c”. In this right context, actually formula E=mc2 is just worthless. It is only the case of such a K.E which, due to the mass having been reached to the maximum value of velocity (may be just hypothetically), has become Total Energy.

Nuclear Bomb was the result of later discoveries of hidden Nuclear forces and was not the result of this formula. Neither this formula has anything to do with those nuclear forces. It is the nature of Nuclear Structure of any atom which determines energy contents of that element. Mere “mass” does not determine it. If it were the case then Scientists should not have needed Uranium etc. because they could get mere mass from other common elements like iron etc. also, for making Nuclear Bomb.

“Professional scientists” are making us fool by saying Einstien had some extraordinary brain…!!!

### 4 Responses to “Issue of larger brain size of Einstien:”

1. ### Usmansaid

E=mc has been proved to be the major and most advanced achievements in the field of Physics, However as far as my knowledge is concerned Einstien didn’t posses such an extraordinary brain (which the scientist claimed that). Now after reading your different blogs which are indeed worth reading and sharing, my mind is dragging me to that particular blog of Intuition can be replicated in to its original form or it cannot, which you discussed in your “Allam Iqbal’s Approach towards the issue of Rationality” article. So probably what Einstien has observed cannot meet his transparency form. Because now a days there are too much debate going on this formula and it gets so much classifications.

2. ### khuramsaid

Thanks Usman for the comments. But a thing which was not “whole new” … and is traceable to earlier simpler theories,, cannot be categorized as “achievement in creativity”, even if it is right.

3. ### raitasaid

yeh I agree with you

4. ### khawajahassansaid

Yes nice sharing